What distinguishes 'broad powers' from 'specific powers' of the court?

The distinction between 'broad powers' and 'specific powers' of the court lies in how those powers are utilized in the management of cases. Broad powers are characterized by their flexibility, granting the court discretion to manage cases in a way that is appropriate to the circumstances, without being narrowly defined. This means that the court can adopt a range of measures or approaches as it sees fit to ensure that justice is served effectively and efficiently.

In contrast, specific powers are generally more limited and detailed in their scope. They often pertain to particular actions or remedies that the court is authorized to take, which can restrict the court's ability to adapt its approach to a case.

By having broad powers, the court can respond dynamically to the needs of a case, considering various factors such as the interests of justice and the effective use of court resources. This flexibility is essential in ensuring that the court can deliver appropriate outcomes in a diverse array of situations.