What does judicial review involve?

Judicial review primarily involves the examination of government actions to determine whether they are consistent with the law. This process allows courts to assess whether legislative or executive actions exceed authority or violate principles of legality or constitutional provisions. The essence of judicial review is ensuring that government actions are accountable under the law, thereby protecting individuals’ rights and maintaining the rule of law within the state.

In contrast, examining contracts for validity pertains to contract law, which focuses on the enforceability of private agreements, rather than the review of governmental authority. Assessing the fairness of trial procedures relates to ensuring due process in legal proceedings, but is distinct from the broader scope of judicial review which primarily focuses on governmental actions. Overseeing the enforcement of court orders involves ensuring compliance with judicial directives, rather than questioning the legality or appropriateness of legislative actions or executive decisions. Therefore, the focus of judicial review aligns closely with the assessment of government actions for legality, which is clearly captured in the correct answer.