What is the test for determining whether to grant an injunction?

Injunctions are a form of equitable relief granted by the courts to prevent harm or injury when monetary damages would be insufficient. The test for determining whether to grant an injunction includes the consideration of whether there is a serious question that needs to be tried. This threshold establishes that the applicant’s case is not frivolous or vexatious and raises a legitimate issue for the court's determination.

This requirement is crucial because it ensures that the court is only asked to intervene where there is a bona fide issue in dispute that warrants judicial consideration. Moreover, after establishing a serious question, the court typically goes on to balance the convenience or harm to the parties involved, often assessing whether the balance of convenience favors granting the injunction and whether the public interest is served by the injunction.

The other options do not capture the comprehensive test applied by the courts. Proving only financial harm is insufficient because the courts may also consider irreparable harm that is not solely financial in nature. Similarly, while witness testimony can be relevant, it is not a prerequisite for the granting of an injunction, as a strong case can sometimes rely on documentary evidence or other forms of proof. Lastly, the opposing party's agreement, while potentially helpful, does not constitute a requirement for obtaining an injunction since it