What type of evidence is allowed in civil proceedings during interlocutory applications?

In the context of civil proceedings during interlocutory applications, hearsay evidence is permitted under certain conditions. Hearsay generally refers to statements made outside of court that are offered in court for the truth of the matter asserted. While hearsay is often considered inadmissible in full trials due to the concerns around reliability and the inability to cross-examine the declarant, interlocutory applications may have different evidentiary standards.

Interlocutory applications typically involve urgent matters requiring interim orders, and the rules of evidence can be more relaxed to ensure that the court can make timely decisions based on the available information. This flexibility allows parties to present hearsay evidence, provided it meets specific criteria or if the court deems it appropriate and relevant to the application at hand.

This is important for ensuring that parties can effectively present their cases and that the court can consider all relevant information to make informed decisions on interim matters. Other types of evidence like direct evidence, expert testimony, and physical evidence may also be relevant but have stricter rules regarding their admissibility, especially in terms of procedural compliance and foundational requirements in civil trials.