Which factor is considered when courts determine bail in civil matters?

In civil matters, when courts determine bail, a key consideration is the balance of convenience. This concept revolves around assessing which party would be more adversely affected by the granting or denying of bail. The court weighs the potential harm that each party might suffer if bail is granted versus if it is denied. It involves evaluating the likelihood of the plaintiff's claims being successful and the defendant's ability to comply with court orders if bail is allowed.

In contrast, other factors mentioned, such as the severity of the offense, usually pertain to criminal cases rather than civil matters. Public opinion may influence perceptions about a case but does not play a formal role in the legal framework concerning bail decisions in civil litigation. Lastly, while financial resources could inform the court's understanding of a party's ability to comply with court orders, they are not a primary consideration in determining the balance of convenience, which ultimately guides the bail conditions in civil contexts.